Our client, a pharmacist, IK, has avoided the most severe sanction of removal from the register after a professional conduct case concluded with only a short suspension.

IK faced extremely serious allegations relating to both his personal and professional conduct. A negative finding could have resulted in immediate erasure from the register, a “catastrophic” outcome for them.

Legal representatives, led by fitness to practise defence barrister, Stephen McCaffrey, were instructed early in the proceedings—a move that proved decisive. Over several months, the defence team conducted a detailed analysis of the General Pharmaceutical Council’s (GPhC) case and witness evidence. This preparation underpinned extensive cross‑examination and carefully planned legal submissions before the Fitness to Practise Committee.

The Committee ultimately found only the most minor allegations proven, some of which were partially accepted. In light of this, the GPhC was forced to reconsider its position. Rather than erasure, the Committee imposed a short suspension, reflecting the limited findings.

Stephen said:

“IK was a realistic and engaged client who understood the importance of a clear strategy – and the importance of sticking to it. The outcome spoke for itself and we are delighted for him.”