Article

With representation from Kings View Chambers, a long‑running General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) investigation into historic governance and management concerns has concluded with no referral to a fitness to practise hearing, following detailed remediation work and legal submissions on behalf of the registrant.

The case centred on early‑stage governance failings identified in the pharmacist’s business. The pharmacist had openly acknowledged shortcomings in the initial setup of the service. Working alongside Kings View Chambers and Kings View Resolutions, they implemented updated governance structures, addressed identified risks, and demonstrated sustained and relevant remediation.

Following these steps, the GPhC agreed to dispose of the matter by issuing a warning rather than referring the case to a full Principal Hearing.

Fitness to practise defence barrister Stephen McCaffrey said:

“Avoiding a fitness to practise hearing was a fantastic outcome for our client, whose business is now thriving. Once again this case demonstrated the importance of seeking early advice, agreeing a sensible strategy and then following through. We are delighted for AH.”

Our client praised Stephen’s approach, highlighting his clear explanations, pragmatic guidance and ability to reduce uncertainty during a stressful regulatory process. 

Stephen combines an exceptional understanding of GPhC fitness to practise processes with a calm, measured, and pragmatic approach. He took the time to explain the process clearly, identify the key issues, and provide practical guidance at every stage.  What stood out most was his ability to reduce uncertainty. Rather than speculation or assumptions, his advice was grounded in experience, professionalism, and a clear understanding of the regulatory framework.  For any healthcare professional facing concerns about their registration, reputation, or professional future, having the right support can make a significant difference. Stephen helped turn what felt like an overwhelming situation into one that could be approached methodically and confidently.”

Seek specialist advice early

Questions about whether, when and how to disclose regulatory issues — including those arising overseas — are often complex. Taking specialist advice before responding to a regulator or employer can be critical.

Kings View Chambers has a proven track record representing doctors and other healthcare professionals in fitness to practise proceedings, including cases involving overseas disciplinary findings and cross‑border regulatory matters.

Rated Excellent and recognised for its expertise in professional discipline and healthcare regulation, Kings View Chambers regularly assists professionals facing serious regulatory investigations and proceedings.

Unparalleled experience in the GPhC fitness to practise arena.

Name

What We Do

GPhC Defence Barristers

GPhC Fitness to Practise

We advise and represent pharmacists, pharmacies and other pharmacy professionals in all matters relating to fitness to practise.

GPhC Defence Barristers

GPhC Appeals

We represent pharmacists, pharmacy owners and other professionals in appeals before tribunals and all courts.

GPhC Defence Barristers

GPhC Interim Orders

We support pharmacists, pharmacy owners and other professional with interim orders and interim order reviews.

GPhC Defence Barristers

GPhC Restoration Applications

We have significant experience and success in assisting pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals with restoration applications.

GPhC Defence Barristers

GPhC Registration

We can support and advise pharmacists and other professional with any GPhC registration issues and difficulties.

GPhC Defence Barristers

Legal Consultancy

We also provide a range of legal consultancy services to help with compliance, including online and remove dispensing.